Search blog.co.uk

Posts archive for: 11 March, 2008
  • Cheap Day Return (Part 6)

    The door unsealed itself in front of me, petals opening then spiralling away. Portal was no longer trying to engage me in conversation and was humming something not unlike Cavalleria Rusticana. It could have orchestrated the melody without taxing its diodes but instead chose to deliver it in a phlegm-filled murmur. Was it a critique of my fatuous desire for heroism, or just a mild annoyance to keep my mind occupied? I suspect both.

    Once again, I ran diagnostic routines and all my sub-systems responded as intended. Peripheral fields offered me views of the chamber in all relevant spectra, there were no glitches in the autonomic suite and the displacement utilities were primed. I tightened some straps, smoothed my eyebrows and adjusted my lucky pants. I bit into my left thumb until I tasted copper, heard the polite chime of a pain response and watched as the puncture laced itself closed and a bead of blood fell to the floor where it bounced once then rolled to a stop. Portal stopped humming with a choking sound. I apologised, stooped and flicked the ruby out of the chamber.

    I remained stooped as Portal cleared its non-existent throat. The door sealed itself behind me, the petals this time no prettier than closing jaws seen from the wrong side. The roseate light neither alarmed nor comforted and the silence was impenetrable, bereft of the whip and crackle of massive energies pulling at the leash. My fields showed me that the spots where my crystallised blood had touched the floor had just been irradiated. Portal apologised for being so surgical but this was after all a kind of transplant. It suggested I might like to count down from ten, assuring me that I’d be gone by zero.

    I got no further than forming the words ‘ready when you are’ in my forebrain. I’d squeezed my eyes shut and before I could pry them open again numerous pain receptors were chiming and I was outdoors under a deluge of UV light being propelled away from a figure by pre-programmed reflexes. I stifled the offensive protocols which were vying with the pain to be heard. I gave myself a surge of stim to help cut down the processing time. I rocked on my haunches on hot stone as this new world rolled slowly around me.

    Nothing I saw resembled a weapon, much less any hostile intent. I could see, hear, feel and breathe; all encouraging signs. I didn’t need my eyes to tell me the bad news. Portal hadn’t transported as much of me as it had planned. Had it been a carpenter, a discrepancy of a millimetre or two might have resulted in nothing worse than a sticking door. In my case, I’d lost most of my hair, all of my clothes and the tips of several fingers and toes. My skin looked like it had been flash-fried and was still crimson with heat.

    I noted and filed the pain bulletins, raising a prayer of thanks to the gods of technology. Before my medtech had been installed, I’d experimented with old fashioned pain just to see what all the fuss was about. What I found would have supported an argument for an utterly malicious creator. Good as the entry level brain is at reporting pain, it can’t leave it at that. It has to keep screaming its message at lung-bursting volumes, and won’t desist even when the unfortunate victim has done all they can about the source of the pain. Opiates and the like seem to have been about as effective as holding a pillow over a screaming patient’s head; the only way to really kill the pain was to really kill the patient. Don’t hate me too much because I’ve never experienced toothache outside a virtual sensorium.

    Had such a thing been possible, the flashing and jabbering of pain bulletins would have given me a headache. My nanonics could solve some of my problems, but I’d need shelter and nutrition first. Even then, I could hardly re-grow my suit and its fabulous toys. A short jump from where I squatted, on the lip of a smouldering, concave depression in the stone, teetered the figure I’d first seen. In the slo-mo time induced by the stim I could just make out that he was falling forwards. He was short and wiry by our standards, with a complexion like varnished maple. He wore a baggy linen suit with matching fedora. One hand was moving to protect his face with its clenched teeth and half-closed eyes; the other held the stalks of a bouquet of flowers, neatly cut and smouldering, the blooms nowhere to be seen.

    TBC

  • Turning A Blind Ear

    Most news is just entertainment with a gloss of social conscience. For purveyors of daily or rolling news, the instant drama of earthquakes, plane crashes and the abduction of pretty blonde children can't be scheduled or relied upon. All too often, old news or humdrum truisms have to be prodded and squeezed into controversy that can be passed off as news.

    The worst offender has to be the Jeremy Vine Show on Radio 2, a.k.a. Daily Mail FM. On slow news days, the show will polarise the most banal observations into issues worthy of heated studio punditry and breathless hands-free tirades from truckers. The show's nadir was surely the punishment meted out to the Oxfam spokesman who, presumably having drawn the short straw, was wheeled on to whisper that although his charity was grateful for all saleable donations, they'd be equally grateful for less useless tat such as headless dolls, single shoes and well scrubbed-in underpants suitable only for landfill. Naturally, some ranting loony from Civitas, Gravitas or Bigotras was tasked to excoriate the hapless hemp-wearer for his effrontery and ingratitude. I didn't take notes, but it was something to do with workers, voters, taxpayers and charity beginning at home, although it wasn't clear whose home.

    Yesterday however, the show finally drew me in and had me howling and snorting at the radio. A deaf couple were reprising the view, given earlier that day to John Humphreys, that deaf parents should be allowed to screen embryos to ensure conception of a deaf baby. Apparently, there is within the deaf community a small but vocal lobby in favour of allowing parents to choose offspring better suited to deaf family life.

    The articulate and intelligent couple were steadfast in their view that deafness was not a disability, but a different ability. If during an IVF procedure they were offered four embryos, they would cast aside the three with entirely normal genotypes in favour of the deaf one. Through their very fluent hearing translator, they refused to concede that deafness was in any way a physical impediment or abnormality. Far from maiming their offspring, they would be endowing them with their own rich language and culture.

    If my wife and I were paraplegics with strong ties to a support group and perhaps a Paralympics medal or two, would that entitle us to cripple our child to make it better suited to our cultural and home life? It might be the case that our disability had made us exceed ourselves and find pride and meaning in adversity. We might be in better mental and aerobic shape than the average able-bodied couch potato. It wouldn't entitle us to choose that ordeal for any other living soul.

    Nor could we dispute that we were disabled. The overused term 'political correctness' is often just an excuse for unthinking moral relativism. Were I paraplegic, I would be disabled. I have a back injury with long-term effects which renders me somewhat disabled, though sadly not to a degree which would score me a parking permit. Disabled does not imply unequal, invalid or incapable, but it might come to be seen as a blanket term for all of them if it is made a dark incantation that dare not be uttered in the presence of the otherwise enabled.

    If a disabled person has exceeded their disability, all glory to them. It doesn't then follow that they should be allowed to inflict it on any other person just because they've tailored new cultural prejudices from ill-fitting cloth. It seems certain lobbying charities have gone beyond the worthy bid for equality of opportunity to find themselves defying reality. The fact that someone has a disability, regardless of the nomenclature used, doesn’t mean lunatic views should be indulged. To do so would be demeaning to all concerned.

    This debate isn't likely to go away. Genetic science may soon enable us to both screen out faulty genes and screen in advantageous ones. If an ambitious couple are one day allowed to engineer the super-athlete they always dreamed of hot-housing, shouldn't disabled parents be afforded the same opportunity to indulge their idea of cultural worth? If idiots with numerous healthy kids are allowed fertility treatment just to correct a gender imbalance, shouldn't deaf people be allowed to indulge an equally fatuous ideal? I’m sure Jeremy Vine will cover it.

    Disjointed rant ends.

Footer:

The content of this website belongs to a private person, blog.co.uk is not responsible for the content of this website.